
Online Baccarat NEWS
Online Baccarat
What is the best online slot website?
Date: 2023-12-06 18:08:24 | Author: Online Baccarat | Views: 893 | Tag: voslot
-
Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc were disqualified from Sunday’s United States Grand Prix after breaching the rules governing the floor of their cars in a shock end to the race weekend voslot
Hamilton and Leclerc, who finished second and sixth respectively in the 56-lap race won by Max Verstappen, were being investigated by the stewards following a plank wear inspection in Austin voslot
The original report from FIA technical delegate Joe Bauer stated: “A physical floor and a plank wear inspection was carried out on car numbers 16 [Leclerc] and 44 [Hamilton] voslot
“The skids located in this area are found to be not in compliance with Article 3 voslot
5 voslot
9 e) of the 2023 Formula One Technical Regulations voslot
I am referring this matter to the stewards for their consideration voslot
”Personnel from both Mercedes and Ferrari were summoned to see the stewards and, just after 7pm local time in Austin and more than three hours after the race finished, their disqualification from the race was confirmed voslot
Hamilton therefore loses the 18 points earned from his second-place finish, while Leclerc loses eight points voslot
Both drivers, however, do have the right to an appeal but it is understood Mercedes will not appeal the FIA’s verdict voslot
In a Mercedes press release, Hamilton stated he was simply “disappointed” with the penalty, while team boss Toto Wolff admitted “we got it wrong voslot
” The FIA note reveals that the cars of Verstappen and Lando Norris (who now moves up to second from third in the final classification) were also inspected, but passed the checks voslot
Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc have been disqualified from the US Grand Prix (Getty Images)The section of the rulebook referred to reads: “The thickness of the plank assembly measured normal to the lower surface must be 10mm [plus or minus] 0 voslot
2mm and must be uniform when new voslot
“A minimum thickness of 9mm will be accepted due to wear, and conformity to this provision will be checked at the peripheries of the designated holes voslot
”The ruling means Williams driver Logan Sargeant earns his first F1 point in bizarre circumstances at his home race voslot
The final stewards report said: “During the hearing, the team acknowledged that the measurement performed by the FIA Technical Team was correct and stated that the high wear on the skid pads was probably a result of the unique combination of the bumpy track and the Sprint race schedule that minimized the time to set up and check the car before the race voslot
NEW TOP-10 - UNITED STATES GRAND PRIX 1 voslot
Max Verstappen2 voslot
Lando Norris3 voslot
Carlos Sainz4 voslot
Sergio Perez5 voslot
George Russell6 voslot
Pierre Gasly7 voslot
Lance Stroll8 voslot
Yuki Tsunoda9 voslot
Alex Albon10 voslot
Logan Sargeant“The Stewards note that the onus is on the competitor to ensure that the car is in compliance with the regulations at all times during an event voslot
“In this particular case, the rear skid in the area defined in the Technical Delegate’s report was outside of the thresholds outlined in Article 3 voslot
5 voslot
9 e) of the FIA Formula One Technical Regulations, which includes a tolerance for wear voslot
“Therefore, the standard penalty for a breach of the Technical Regulations is imposed voslot
” Breaches of technical checks of the car often result in disqualification, with a recent example being Hamilton from qualifying in Brazil in 2021 voslot
Hamilton finished the race in second but will now lose the 18 points earned (Getty Images)Michael Schumacher was disqualified from the 1994 Belgian Grand Prix for an illegal floor, allowing Damon Hill to win the race voslot
Hamilton was already in hot water with the FIA for an unrelated matter, after crossing a live track at the last race in Qatar and was spoken to again in Texas due to his status as a “role model voslot
”Leclerc started Sunday’s race on pole but, opting for a different strategy, fell behind after Norris stole a march on the Ferrari at the start voslot
Hamilton, meanwhile, came close to victory after reeling in Verstappen - who was booed on the podium - at the end voslot
The 38-year-old has not won in nearly two years, with his last victory coming in Saudi Arabia in December 2021, but this disqualification will be a bitter pill for the seven-time world champion to swallow ahead of the next race, this weekend in Mexico voslot
More aboutLewis HamiltonCharles LeclercFIAJoin our commenting forumJoin thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their repliesComments1/3Chaos as Hamilton disqualified four hours after finishing second in USChaos as Hamilton disqualified four hours after finishing second in USLewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc have been disqualified from the US Grand Prix Getty ImagesChaos as Hamilton disqualified four hours after finishing second in USHamilton finished the race in second but will now lose the 18 points earned Getty ImagesChaos as Hamilton disqualified four hours after finishing second in USLewis Hamilton, left, and Charles Leclerc were both disqualified from the raceAFP via Getty Images✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today voslot
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored FeaturesGet in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicsvoslot BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery ActThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy voslot
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply voslot
Hi {{indy voslot
fullName}}My Independent PremiumAccount detailsHelp centreLogout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}}@keyframes slidedown-video{0%{transform:translateY(-100%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}}@keyframes slideup-video{0%{transform:translateY(200%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}} voslot

England continued on the path towards one of their worst ever World Cup campaigns with a humbling 229-run defeat to South Africa on Saturday voslot
As well as being England’s heaviest one-day international defeat by runs, it was their third in four games at this year’s tournament – one away from equalling an unwanted record voslot
They lost four out of six games in both 1996 and 2015 and here, the PA news agency looks at how the current tournament compares voslot
1996England lost their opening game to New Zealand by 11 runs, but wins over group minnows the United Arab Emirates and the Netherlands essentially ensured their quarter-final place, in a format which lent itself to the big teams progressing comfortably voslot
They rounded out the group stage with defeats to South Africa, by 78 runs, and Pakistan by seven wickets, leaving them fourth and facing Group A surprise package Sri Lanka, who won the quarter-final by five wickets with almost 10 overs to spare on their way to the title – Sanath Jayasuriya hit 82 off 44 balls voslot
A bowling attack led by Darren Gough and Peter Martin, and with spinner Richard Illingworth sharing the new ball against Sri Lanka, struggled in the tournament and took their wickets at an average of 33 runs, which would remain England’s worst at a World Cup until 2011 voslot
Only four England batters passed 100 runs, including captain Michael Atherton who averaged 19 voslot
83 voslot
2015A 15-run defeat to underdogs Bangladesh was the key moment as England exited the tournament in the group stage for only the third time, following 1999 and 2003 voslot
England were also heavily beaten by Pool A’s fancied teams, by 111 runs against Australia and eight and nine wickets respectively against New Zealand and Sri Lanka, with their only wins coming against Scotland and Afghanistan voslot
Their average of 29 voslot
49 runs for each wicket lost was their third-lowest at a World Cup, beating only 1979 (23 voslot
82) and 2003 (25 voslot
85), while a rate of 37 voslot
47 per wicket taken was their worst ever voslot
Among bowlers who played at least three games, only Steven Finn (25 voslot
00) averaged under 45 voslot
2023England are on track for worse averages with bat and ball than in that dismal 2015 campaign, currently averaging 27 voslot
13 runs per wicket lost and a barely believable 42 voslot
61 with the ball voslot
Dawid Malan’s beautiful century against Bangladesh is a lone hand so far – Mark Wood remarkably leads the batting averages, with 80 runs in 58 balls for one dismissal, but has taken three wickets at 70 voslot
Reece Topley, who leads the bowling averages with eight wickets at 22 voslot
87, will not play again at the tournament due to a broken finger voslot
The 229-run margin against South Africa surpassed by over 100 England’s previous heaviest World Cup loss batting second, a 122-run defeat to the same opposition in 1999 voslot
Australia last year inflicted England’s then-record ODI defeat, by 221 runs voslot
Similarly, the nine-wicket loss to New Zealand has been surpassed only once, Sri Lanka chasing down 230 without losing a wicket in 2011, and matched twice more – by South Africa in 2007 and Sri Lanka in 2015 voslot
The Black Caps had 82 balls remaining, exceeded only by the Proteas among those games and by only three England World Cup losses ever voslot
England’s only other four-loss World Cup came in 2007, when they played nine games in a tournament featuring a ‘Super Eight’ stage voslot
They lost three in 1987, 1992, 2003, 2011 and on their way to the 2019 title voslot
More aboutEnglandSri LankaSouth AfricaNew Zealand1/1How England’s World Cup woes compare to previous tournamentsHow England’s World Cup woes compare to previous tournamentsJos Buttler’s side stand on the brink of elimination (Rafiq Maqbool/AP)AP✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today voslot
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored FeaturesGet in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicsvoslot BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery ActThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy voslot
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply voslot
Hi {{indy voslot
fullName}}My Independent PremiumAccount detailsHelp centreLogout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}} voslot


Online Baccarat RECOMMEND